A Financial analysis of THE PepsiCO COMPANY - Free Essay Example

The financial analysis is based done to find which place in the field and company which place they are all in and in the market .it else are project different pictures based on the mind on the observation these observer are different people who are related to company in some way like managers is a person who as to observe the growth of the company to frame policy to improve it. ABOUT PEPSI CO: Pepsi co is one of the leading hygienic food corporation, because they invest lot of things to produce the good and use full products to the customers .They started their business in the year of 1965, for that those are not a leading company, it has lot of companies who has a competitors to them selfs. In the competitive field they must to show something different things, then only they can achieve and shine in the compare to others, normally each and every organization introduce the new products, by complete these all things they came to their position, they are not suddenly came to t heir position, they developed by step by step in the way of initially they get the profit of 15%, after, they work hard and good encourage of their employees they develop their profit as double the term of they get before. After they are very much of interest in develop their business in worldwide and their market shares also growing very high compare to before, they get new share holders and investors to the corporation. Finally they successes, they develop their business in the world wide in the last few years. Now they are the leading competitors, so they are push to regain their capital investment as double, and they need to repay the money if they borrow from any bank, and they must have the liquid money in hand because, some times they need to face the situation at any time or else suddenly some fluctuation will happen, the company flows down Not only based on that we cant decide the company goes as a good level, we need to concentrate the managers and employees and s tock holders. MANAGERS: The manager will focus on where the company success and where it fails by using the standard method ratio analysis the data which is available for manager will not available for other peoples work in the organization. Because manager holding the details about the secret deals and the finance details about the organization. So he is in the situation to keep it safe and secure .if any problem will happen we need to ask the manager. The managers have some works to become a successful organization to all data related to growth of frames like 1. Performance of employee. 2. All the project ability ratio. 3. Current depth and current liability. 4. Access to the stack holders data. STOCK HOLDERS: Stack holders are the real owners of the company because they have all the investments and majority of the company. All the investments of the stock holders put in the company name. Important aspect here is access to only certain data like what is current profit, and company earning, and company liability, and depth and all the external data. They dont have permission to access to the internal data, as well as whats going inside. But they have a rights to only put the pressure to the company managers, as whats status of the company and they can ask the details about the profit and investments, because they are all the real owners of the organization. The company CEO has the full permission to access the all details. Employers and the investors, buy the company in the form public share certificate the company release the balance sheet every year, which contain all the financial detail of the company that is performance of the company observer by release the balance sheet. Example: The gross profit represents the profit of the company and it gives the company has it hand here the expenses included where as by the net profit. They can identify where the company stand. Because here we excluded the income tax cost of p roducing good and all the other related to the company product. i.e for each dolor investor what they here at the end of the day these represent the true profitability of the company. THE EMPLOYEE: Employee has access to the records. he cant see all the records, that has seen by CEO of the company, he will not shown the true profit of the company earnings. Since he is internal to the company he can send the certain data for happenings. CEO: He is the one having all the power he has the rights to access the all legal datas and he is person going to decide whats going to happen next and he is the one having the power of final decision. DATA ANALYSIS: Ratio is nothing but the dividing one numerical value by another and we get the proportion that can be expressed in percentage by seen the balance sheet we cant understand anything we here to divide certain value by other we conclude are advice on profit less and planning the budget of the company. Example Current value = current assessment / current liability The main purpose of doing analysis on corporation is compare to other company which involved in food and privilege production like coca cola,cardbury, by doing this we can find where pepsi corporation stand in terms of profit, shares, investments, and so on we can find the shares of pepsi corporation over estimated. And under planning policies for the company restricting the existing structure or processors to improve the profitability. It is used by banks, managers, and other external financial to determine whether the loan can be granted to the current financial performances its investments, and future groups. The bank managers use the ratio to see whether the company in good position and they can manage the current depth. Finally they take the decision to grand loan to the company or not. The only limitation of ratio analysis is that its done by company itself. We can predict the fails of the ratio analysis. Net Debt Rat io: CALCULATION D + PVOL CMS L* = _________________ NP + D + PVOL CMS D = total market value of the net debt PVOL = the present value of the operating lease commitments CMS = is the cash and marketable securities N = is the number of common shares P = is the common stock price According to case study of the PepsiCo, the values for net debt ratio is, D = 9453 $ PVOL = 479 * 5 = 2395 CMS = 1498 (1498*25/100) = 1123.50 N = 55.875 P = 790 NP = 55.875 * 790 = 44, 141.25 9453+ 2395 1123.50 Net debt ratio = ____________________________ = 19.54 % 44,141.25 + 9453 +2395 1123.50 Ratios How it Works PepsiCo Cadbury Schweppes Coca-Cola Coca -Cola Enterprise Mac Donald Interest Coverage ratio EBIT/INTEREST 4.8 % 4.9 % 16.9 % 1.4 % 7.3 % Fixed charge coverage ratio EBIT +Fixed cost before tax/interest+fixed cost before tax 3.09 % 4.2 % 16.9 % 14.06 % 3. 58 5 Long-Te rm debt ratio Long-term debt ratio/longterm debt+ Equtiy (No of shares * No of Prices) 1.657 % .9031 % .9031 % 51.76 % 11.251 % Total debt to Adjusted to total capitalization Long-term debt+short term/Long-term debt+short-term debt +common stock 17.6 % 14.61 % 1.65 % 15.21 % 12.6 % Ratio of cash to long-term debt Cash flow/long-term debt 42.7 % 52.694 % 27.3 % 15.56 % 53.9 % Ratio of cash to total debt Cash flow/Total debt 39.55 % 33.02 % 18.39 % 15.32 % 47.47 % A measure of a companys ability to repay all debt if it were immediately or for a long time period. Many investors use net debt in making investment decisions, as it gives them an idea of a companys financial status and its level of leverage compared to liquid assets. Some industries may have mere net debt than others, therefore, investors often companys net debt to others in the same business.(1) It can be calculate by the adding the tota l market value of net debt by present value of operating lease commitments and minus the cash and market security and then divide by the common shares and prices the add total net debt by lease commitments and minus the cash and market security. The Net Debt ratio of the PepsiCo is 19.45% which indicates the company overall debt situation. The company has long term debt which is 8,747 $ and the short term debt is 706 $ while compare with the last year the debt shrinks and cash increase, this shows the improvement in the balance sheet. From the above graph we can easily find out the debt ratio for the last few years, and easily compare to the last years and tell that they are still developing. In other aspects PepsiCo too much long term debt will find themselves overwhelmed with interest payments, a risk having too little capital and ultimately bankruptcy. In other words the ratio of debt of PepsiCo used in the analysis of balance sheet to show the amount of protection av ailable to creditors. The 19.54 % ratio indicates that the business has a lot of risk because if more principal and interested on its obligation. Its depends upon the share holders are reluctant to give financing with a high debt postion. However, the status of debt vary on the type of business. According to PepsiCo it has a liquid cash which can maintain the share holders compensation. Usually book value is used to measure a firms of debt security in calculating the ratio. Market value may be more realistic measures, anyhow because it takes account into current market conditions. Measure of a firms assets financed y debt and therefore, a measure of its financial risk. PepsiCo generally the better off the firm. RATIO ANALYSIS: Ratio is a general term, it is obtained by one value divide by another. It is denoted in the form of percentage (%), there are certain ratios to calculate .The purpose of analysis on the PepsiCo corporation is to compare with other companies with s ame category soft drink packed food production coca-cola .By this calculation we can find were the PepsiCo corporation stand in term of profit ,sales , investments. With help of this calculation we can say that PepsiCo share is over estimated or under estimated, ratio are fundamental analysis . Ratio analysis fails when compression made with different category company ie (the company taken for analysis should be same category) here let take PepsiCo and Coca-Coca because this companies were same category and opponent. Here we have to calculate six different ratios to PepsiCo and we going to compare with other companies. Interest coverage ratio Fixed charge coverage ratio Long term debt ratio Total debt to adjusted total capitalization Ratio of cash flow to long term debt Ratio of cash flow to total debt INTEREST COVERAGE RATIO It is a type of gearing ratio that is used by the outside the finance parties loan to the business (i.e.) it tells the extent to wh ich to which the business in currently finance by the outside factor for the accessing risk, because how much they we can tell how much is the own money we have inside huge amount of outside finance, the currently profitability decreases for the finance raises very high, in that situation they cant pay back. The company will go bank erupt. Here the interest cover rate ratio represents the amount of profit that available to they interest cover lower it means that they can pay the interest at the greater risk like this means the coke is more strong in earning compare the McDonalds corporation doing better than Pepsi. Interest Coverage Ratio=EBIT(earnings before interest tax) / Interest As per datas given in the questions The Different interest cover ratios are For PepsiCo is 4.6 %, its somewhat better to others because the EBIT is $ 3,114, then the interest is $682, finally Interest Coverage Ratio 4.6. For the Cadbury Schweppes, EBIT is $ 4,600, the interest is $ 272 , finally the interest coverage ratio is 4.9% For McDonald, EBIT is $2,509, and the interest is 340 and finally the interest coverage ratio is 7.3%. From the above the PepsiCo is more stronger than Coca-Cola enterprise , this means more strong in earning to back the interest the only way to solve this problem, company should increase the sales and repayment to the concern parties. pay back ratio comes down then other option is liquidity (i.e.) money in cash . If the company invests more in assert and having less liquidity then it will not give back loan and it will leads to company to get bank tarp. The only way to solve the problem (i.e.) it should try to increase the shares and payback certain amount to the leaders thus , once the depth are come down, or the others once option is asserts are liquid it can easily pay back in case of emergency, the asserts are not liquid . We can Pay Back the loan in the time period to the bank, it will lead to the bank erupt. TOTAL DEPT H TO TOTAL CAPITAL: It measures the company here age to grow that is how fast company wants to grow here if receives lot of depth and expanses business its going it has lot of risk and it has to pay back to outside financers the major advantages of these ratio is high, that means the cost of depth is greater than the earning from the depth then it go to the bank erupt. Total debt to total capitalization= Total debt / Total debt + Common stock How we calculate the total depth to total capital? For the PepsiCo Total Debt to Total Capitalization is 17.6% by the Total Depth and Common Stack. For the Cadbury Schweppes Total Debt to Total Capitalization is 1.65% by the Total Depth and Common Stack. For the McDonald Total Debt to Total Capitalization is 12.6% by the Total Depth and Common Stack. From the calculated data PepsiCo has 17.6, its more high compare to other companies in the field. in PepsiCo they maintaining gradual level to reach the 17.6%. if the debt is h igher than the capital then risk is higher, from my point of view PepsiCo should avoid the risk by reducing the debt when it goes higher than capital, PepsiCo have to reduce their debt ratio then risk become less .By this way we can reduce the Total debt to total Capitalization. FIXED CHARGE COVERING RATIO: Fixed charge coverage ratio, explained, is a strong indicator of a companys future problems if sales drop to any extent. It is especially important for a company who spends heavily on leases. The lower the operation profit, the worse negative effects of fixed payments will become. For example, a company will feel heavier burden of lease payments combined with interest expense with declining sales. What Does Fixed-Charge Coverage Ratio Mean? A ratio that indicates a firms ability to satisfy fixed financing expenses, such as interest and leases. It is calculated as the following: (EBIT + Lease Expenses) / (Lease Expenses + Interest) The fixed charge coverage ratio is a broader measure of how well a firm covers their fixed costs than the times interest earned ratio. The fixed charge coverage ratio includes lease payments as well as interest payments. Lease payments, like interest payments, must be met on an annual basis. The fixed charge coverage ratio is especially important for firms that extensively lease equipment. EBIT, Taxes, and Interest Expense are taken from the companys income statement. Lease Payments are taken from the balance sheet and are usually shown as a footnote on the balance sheet. The result of the fixed charge coverage ratio is the number of times the company can cover its fixed charges per year. The higher the number, the better the debt position of the firm, similar to the times interest earned ratio. Like all ratios, you can only make a determination if the result of this ratio is good or bad if you use either historical data from the company or if you use comparable data from the industry. Ron owns a small b usiness which provides artisan-quality roofing services to upscale homes. Ron has carved a unique niche for his company over time. He is proud of his achievements and satisfied customer base. Recently, the recession has caused Ron to see less jobs for Spanish tile roofing. With this serving as the bread-and-butter of Rons company, he wants to be prepared for additional dips in his revenues due to fewer sales. Ron, essentially, wants to perform fixed charge coverage ratio analysis to assure that his company can survive the recession. Ron, after speaking with his controller, is confident that his company can survive an extended recession. He now needs to make sure his fixed charge coverage ratio covenant (bank requirement) is not violated for his bank loan. Ron has his company controller look at the agreement. Ron, after a little work, realizes that his company has not violated a covenant. Despite the fact that Rons company has an acceptable fixed charge coverage ratio, will nee d to remain the same for his covenants with the bank to stay unbroken. Ron respects the value of keeping up-to-date with financial statements, as well as bank agreements, thanks to the hand of his company accountant. A ratio calculated by dividing profits before payment of interest and income taxes by interest paid on bonds and other long-term debt. The larger the ratio, the safer the company is because it has more of a cushion to pay its debts and avoid default. The ratio illustrates how many times interest charges have been earned by the corporation on a pretax basis. If the ratio is five, the company has earned five times its interest charges, for example. (l. k. nozick / transportation research part E37 (2001) ) All the company should maintain these ratio value as well as good. Based on this we can calculate how well the organization is running (i.e.) the company running in a successful manner or not. It is must for each and every company. If we increase the level of fixed charge coverage ratio, the company is always going in a successful manner, How we calculate fixed charge coverage ratio? Fixed Charge Coverage ratio= (EBIT+FIXED COST) / (INTEREST + FIXED COST) Datas are given as per in the exhibit. The PepsiCo EBIT is $ 3,114, the Fixed Cost is $ 479, the Interest is $682 And finally the Fixed Charge Coverage ratio is 3.09% The Cadbury Schweppes the EBIT is $ 661, Fixed cost is $ 25, Interest is $ 135, then finally the Fixed Charge Coverage ratio is 4.2%. The McDonald EBIT is 2509, the interest is 340%,the fixed cost is 498, then finally the Fixed Charge Coverage ratio is 3.58 % From the above PepsiCo Fixed Charge Coverage is very low comparing to others, to improve that fixed charge coverage ratio Pepsi co must develop the sales and profit simultaneously. Then only he can reach the target without any interruption. From this value PepsiCo has low value compare to other companies, PepsiCo have to develop their sales they have to elaborate the product so by doing this Fixed Charge Coverage will raise surely its my suggestions. Long Term Debt Ratio: Long Term Debt Ratio shows the financial leverage of firm, If a Long Term Debt is outstanding mean, the company can run in the profit side. A variation of the traditional debt-to-equity ratio, this value computes the proportion of a companys long-term debt compared to its available capital. By using this ratio, investors can identify the amount of leverage utilized by a specific company and compare it to others to help analyze the companys risk exposure. Generally, companies that finance a greater portion of their capital via debt are considered riskier than those with lower leverage ratios. The Long Term Debt to Total Capitalization Ratio measures the percentage of the companys Total Assets that are financed with long term debt. For this ratio, Long-Term Debt and Total Stockholders Equity are both considered long-term, as the equity provided by s tockholders is part of the total capitalization (full debt load) of the company. This ratio is another way of looking at the debt structure of the company, specifically determining what portion of the total capitalization is comprised of Long-Term Debt. The Long Term debt ratio = long Term Debt / Long Term debt +Equity How we calculate the long term depth ratio? Datas are given as per in the exhibit? For the PepsiCo Long Term Debt Ratio is 16.57% its calculated by using the table values of Number of Shares and Share Values. For the Cadbury Schweppes Long Term Debt Ratio is 4.2% its calculated by using the table values of Number of Shares and Share Values. For the McDonalds the Long Term Debt Ratio is 11.25% its calculated by using the table values of Number of Shares and Share Values. From the above data PepsiCo long term debt ratio is higher than the all other companies. The ratio is high because due to this developing and they expanding finally introduce th e very new ideas to the field. This two companies Were expanding their business so long debt will going higher because they were reinvest their profit for expanding their business this two company Long term depth is higher compare to other company. Ratio of cash flow to Long term debt: Expense or revenue flow that changes a cash account over a particular period cash inflows usually arise from activates financing, operations or investing, cash outflow are expenses or investor. Long term debt obligations such as bond and note, which have maturities greater than one year, would be considered long term debt .the cash flow ratio is evaluation the organization strength and profitability and the important view of cash flow is sufficiency and efficiency To calculate cash flow to long term debt The cash flow to long term debt = Cash flow / Long term debt How we calculate the cash flow long term debt? Datas as per in the exhibit in the table? For PepsiCo Ratio of Cash Flo w to Long Term 42.7% is calculated by Cash Flow and Long term. For Cadbury Schweppes the Ratio Cash Flow to long Term is 56.94% is calculated by Cash Flow and Long term. For McDonald of Cash Flow to Long Term is 53.9% is calculated by Cash Flow and Long term. From the above data Cadbury higher compare to PepsiCo, if the ratio of cash flow and long term is higher compare to all the other companies in the field, debt will reduce, when the cash flow is higher , so that company is growing higher . if we focus on PepsiCo its nearly to 43% of growth in this ratio , when the cash flow higher then return also be higher so debt will be reduce, then the investor become more as of reducing debt rate. Ratio of Cash flow to total debt: The ratio of cash flow to total debt representing a company ability to satisfy debt, Increase of cash flow to total debt ratio is really positive sign , it shows company is in risk less financial position with this ratio, The ability to satisfy its companys debts there useful in bankruptcy the ratio equals cash flow from operation divided by total liabilities. The cash flow to total debt=cash flow / total debt How we calculate the cash flow long term debt? Datas as per given in the exhibit. For PepsiCo Ratio of cash flow to total debt is 39.55%, is calculated by Cash Flow and Long dept for Cadbury Ratio of cash flow to total debt is 33.02% is calculates by Cash Flow and Long dept For McDonald Ratio of cash flow to total debt is 47.47% is calculates by Cash Flow and Long dept From the above data double digit percent ratio would be the sign of financial strength, Pepsi Co is in sign of finical strength, In low percentage companies has too much of debt and weaker in cash flow generation .its important to invest the large company with low ratio, without no risk, with help of ratio we find the warring sign of company. RATINGS Rating is defined in the form of how much quality they produced and how much amo unt of product they released each and every year, sometimes it is combination of both quantity they produced and delivered each year based on that we can define the ratings. In rating they have two types here Standard Poors Ratings Moody ratings Standard Poors Ratings: Based on, all financial companies are rated. They are mainly about the financial and research analysis of stock and bonds. It is well known for the stock based indexes. Moody Ratings: It is the international financial business analysis and research on commercial and government entities. It is standardized commercial rating scale. Its all are mainly mentioned in grades. Moodys long-term ratings have a lot of opinions Maturity of one year or more. They address the possibility that a financial obligation will not be honored as promised. Such ratings use Moodys Global Scale and reflect both the likelihood of default and any financial loss suffered in the event of default. Aaa Obligations r ated Aaa are judged to be of the highest quality, with minimal credit risk. Aa Obligations rated Aa are judged to be of high quality and are subject to very low credit risk. A Obligations rated A are considered upper-medium grade and are subject to low credit risk. Baa Obligations rated Baa are subject to moderate credit risk. They are considered medium grade and as such may possess certain speculative characteristics. Ba Obligations rated Ba are judged to have speculative elements and are subject to substantial credit risk. B Obligations rated B are considered speculative and are subject to high credit risk. Caa Obligations rated Caa are judged to be of poor standing and are subject to very high credit risk. Ca Obligations rated Ca are highly speculative and are likely in, or very near, default, with some prospect of recovery of principal and interest. C Obligations rated C are the lowest rated class and are typically in default, with little P rospect for recovery of principal or interest. Note: Moodys appends numerical modifiers 1, 2, and 3 to each generic rating classification from Aa through Caa. The Modifier 1 indicates that the obligation ranks in the higher end of its generic rating category; the modifier 2 indicates a mid range ranking; and the modifier 3 indicates a ranking in the lower end of that generic rating category Standard Poors Ratings: A It is a strong capacity to meet the financial commitments. AA It is a very strong capacity to meet the financial commitments A A means it is string capacity to meet the financial commitments and represents the relative standing with in the majority categories. (i.e) strong capacity to meet the financial commitments but somewhat suspensible to adverse economic change in circumstance. In this calculation we need to explain about the A, Aa, A- in S p, A, Aa in Moodys Pepsi co A McDonalds A Cadbury Schweppes AA What should going to ex plain about the ratings in PepsiCo? By the above ratings of S P PepsiCo get the ratings as A because of the interest in develop the business widely and they are eager to reach the high position, for that they need to working hard, then only company will be top compare to others. (i.e) It is a strong capacity to meet the financial commitments. By that I conclude and suggest, encourage motivate the workers to achieve the same work and introduce the more new ideas, to maintain the same level so as for the forth coming years. Then only the company can shine in the field for the long time as in the same position and move to the next level. What should going to explain about the ratings in McDonalds? By the above ratings of S P McDonalds get the ratings as A because of the interest in develop the business widely and they are eager to reach the high position, for that for that they need to working hard, then only company will be top compare to others. (i.e) It is a strong ca pacity to meet the financial commitments. By that I conclude and suggest, encourage motivate the workers to achieve the same work and introduce the more new ideas, to maintain the same level so as for the forth coming years. Then only the company can shine in the field for the long time as in the same position and move to the next level. What should going to explain about the ratings in Cadbury Schweppes? By the above ratings of S P, Cadbury Schweppes get the ratings as AA. They are more better compare to the PepsiCo and McDonalds (i.e) It is a very strong capacity to meet the financial commitments. By that I conclude and suggest, encourage motivate the workers to achieve the same work and introduce the more new ideas, to maintain the same level so as for the forth coming years. Then only the company can shine in the field for the long time as in the same position. Moodys Rating: Pepsi co A McDonalds A2 Cadbury Schweppes A2 In moodys rating they give a notation as A1, A2, A3 and B1, B2, B3, upto C1, C2, C2, What should going to explain about the ratings in PepsiCo? By the above ratings of Moodys PepsiCo get the ratings as A1 because of the interest in develop the business, (i.e) low risk rate investment, in that when you going to invest in this so dont need to care about the tuff situation, because in that less investment risk compare to others. By that I conclude and suggest, encourage motivate the workers to achieve the same work and introduce the more new ideas, to maintain the same level so as for the forth coming years. Then only the company can shine in the field for the long time as in the same position. What should going to explain about the ratings in McDonalds? By the above ratings of Moodys McDonalds get the ratings as A2 because of the interest in develop the business, compare to PepsiCo its very low risk investment(i.e) very low risk rate investment, in that when you going to invest in this so dont nee d to care about the tuff situation, because in that less investment risk compare to others. By that I conclude and suggest, encourage motivate the workers to achieve the same work and introduce the more new ideas, to maintain the same level so as for the forth coming years. Then only the company can shine in the field for the long time as in the same position and move to the next level. What should going to explain about the ratings in Cadbury Schweppes? By the above ratings of Moodys Cadbury Schweppes get the ratings as A1 because of the interest in develop the business, (i.e.) low risk rate investment. Same as above the McDonalds because the both two companies are in the same ratings. PepsiCo get the rating A Does its it reasonable or not? Surely, after the ratings of PepsiCo until March 17th 2010 they getting A Ratings, because they producing and introduce the new ideas daily, then only he can stand in the field without any tuff comphetion. Because its a com petitive world with out any new implements we cant survey here. Not only implementing the new ideas and the company should motivate the employees, to should work hard and we need to reward them, then only the employees would work for the company, and the company profit will automatically increased. In exactly before ten years later PepsiCo get the rating A- after that they work hard and introduce the new concept and try to develop the business widely, after the tuff time of PepsiCo they improve step by step now reached the rating A. How and which basis PepsiCo get the rating A? Based on that all financial status companies are rated. Sometimes they are mainly focus on the financial position and research analysis of stock and bonds. It is well known for the stock based indexes. Except all that the above main reason for PepsiCo get A and the rating given by S P is based on some reasons are Total market value of the net debt D The present value of the operating lease commitments ( pvol ) Is the number of common shares N Is the common stock price P Interest coverage ratio Fixed charge coverage ratio Long term debt ratio Total debt to adjusted total capitalization Ratio of cash flow to long term debt Ratio of cash flow to total debt The rating is mainly based on the above all share values, investment, profit, equity, and the ratio of the share holders, how much amount of net profit company having in the each an d every year. The above values are mostly important for the company and those are independent to others if any of the value is decreases total debt rate of the company will lose, in some case the value may have chance to increase, at time the total profit of the company is surely increased. Then only people will invest the money in the company, then the shares of the company is automatically increased .If the shares of the company is increased means, the company earn more profit in that, by that company can easily pay the fixed expenses and other expenses and the due amount to the bank and, mainly to the borrower, after payback to the all borrowers, the company having some balance amount, based on that the profit of the company is calculated. Sometimes the company will show the fath documents, due to the faith document we can identify that the company going earning more profit, then we automatically inverse the money in that company, for example the satyam softwares in india they show the faith documents. For instance to avoid that faith document showing , S P ratings are introduce and gives the rating to the company. They are fully reviewed about the company and gave the rating to the company. By the conclusion of S P the PepsiCo get the rating A, after verify the all the details of the company like profit, the net income and all the details mentioned above. In that above graph we can easily, find out the improvement of S P ratings result of PepsiCo. GOOD THING: B y that above all conclusion, I should recommend PepsiCo to maintain the same level. for that they must to push and introduce the new ideas and services to the peoples. if they maintain the same level so far the next few years they are the leading business company. They getting the grade A upto till march 17th 2010, before ten years that is approximately 1989 they get the rating as A-. this not happened suddenly they improve the business step by step. For that wise they are came to the High Rating. concentrated Areas: They are still in the same level or the past few years, they need to develop and introduce some more new products to the customer. In my point of view, if they will concentrate in those particular areas like, customer satisfaction, employee encouragement, and leadership then teamwork, they will surely achieve his target. And they will move to the next stage without any doubt. If the net profit increased means, they have possibilities to add some more new share holders and share investors.

History and Invention of Gasoline

Gasoline was not invented, it is a natural by-product of the petroleum industry, kerosene being the principal product. Gasoline is produced by distillation, the separating of the volatile, more valuable fractions of crude petroleum. However, what was invented were the numerous processes and agents needed to improve the quality of gasoline making it a better commodity. The Automobile When the history of the automobile was heading in the direction of becoming the number one method of transportation. There was created a need for new fuels. In the ​nineteenth century, coal, gas, camphene, and kerosene made from petroleum were being used as fuels and in lamps. However, automobile engines required fuels that needed petroleum as a raw material. Refineries could not convert crude oil into gasoline fast enough as automobiles were rolling off the ​assembly line. Cracking There was a need for improvement in the refining process for fuels that would prevent engine knocking and increase engine efficiency. Especially for the new high compression automobile engines that were being designed. The processes that were invented to improve the yield of gasoline from crude oil were known as cracking. In petroleum refining, cracking is a process by which heavy hydrocarbon molecules are broken up into lighter molecules by means of heat, pressure, and sometimes catalysts. Thermal Cracking: William Meriam Burton Cracking is the number one process for the commercial production of gasoline. In 1913, thermal cracking was invented by William Meriam Burton, a process that employed heat and high pressures. Catalytic Cracking Eventually, catalytic cracking replaced thermal cracking in gasoline production. Catalytic cracking is the application of catalysts that create chemical reactions, producing more gasoline. The catalytic cracking process was invented by Eugene Houdry in 1937. Additional Processes Other methods used to improve the quality of gasoline and increase its supply including: Polymerization: converting gaseous olefins, such as propylene and butylene, into larger molecules in the gasoline rangeAlkylation: a process combining an olefin and paraffin such as isobutaneIsomerization: the conversion of straight-chain hydrocarbons to branched-chain hydrocarbonsReforming: using either heat or a catalyst to rearrange a molecular structure Timeline of Gasoline and Fuel Improvements 19th-century  fuels for the automobile were coal tar distillates and the lighter fractions from the distillation of crude oil.On September 5, 1885, the first gasoline pump was manufactured by Sylvanus Bowser of Fort Wayne, Indiana and delivered to Jake Gumper, also of Fort Wayne. The gasoline pump tank had marble valves and wooden plungers and had a capacity of one barrel.On September 6, 1892, the first gasoline-powered tractor, manufactured by John Froelich of Iowa, was shipped to Langford, South Dakota, where it was employed in threshing for approximately 2 months. It had a vertical single-cylinder gasoline engine mounted on wooden beams and drove a J. I. Case threshing machine. Froelich formed the Waterloo Gasoline Tractor Engine Company, which was later acquired by the John Deere Plow Company.On June 11, 1895, the first U.S. patent for a gasoline-powered automobile was issued to  Charles Duryea  of Springfield, Massachusetts.By the early  20th century, the oil companies w ere producing gasoline as a simple distillate from petroleum.During the 1910s, laws prohibited the storage of gasoline on residential properties.On January 7, 1913, William Meriam Burton received a patent for his cracking process to convert oil to gasoline.On January 1, 1918, the first U.S. gasoline pipeline began transporting gasoline through a  three-inch  pipe over 40 miles from Salt Creek to Casper, Wyoming.Charles Kettering  modified an internal combustion engine to run on kerosene. However,  kerosene-fueled  engine knocked and would crack the cylinder head and pistons.Thomas Midgley Jr.  discovered that the cause of the knocking was from the kerosene droplets vaporizing on combustion. Anti-knock agents were researched by Midgley, culminating in tetraethyl lead being added to fuel.On February 2, 1923, for the first time in U.S. history ethyl gasoline was marketed. This took place in Dayton, Ohio.In 1923, Almer McDuffie McAfee developed the petroleum industrys first commercially viable catalytic cracking process, a method that could double or even triple the gasoline yielded from crude oil  by then-standard  distillation methods.By the mid-1920s, gasoline  was  40 to 60 Octane.By the 1930s, the petroleum industry stopped using kerosene.Eugene Houdry invented the catalytic cracking of low-grade fuel into high test gasoline in 1937.During the 1950s, the increase of the compression ratio and higher octane fuels occurred. Lead levels increased and new refining processes (hydrocracking) began.In 1960, Charles Plank and Edward Rosinski patented (U.S. #3,140,249) the first zeolite catalyst commercially useful in the petroleum industry for catalytic cracking of petroleum into lighter products such as gasoline.In the 1970s, unleaded fuels were introduced.From 1970 until 1990 lead was phased out.In 1990, the Clean Air Act created major changes on gasoline, rightfully intended to eliminate pollution.

The Marshmallow Test Delayed Gratification in Children

The marshmallow test, which was created by psychologist Walter Mischel, is one of the most famous psychological experiments ever conducted. The test lets young children decide between an immediate reward, or, if they delay gratification, a larger reward. Studies by Mischel and colleagues found that children’s ability to delay gratification when they were young was correlated with positive future outcomes. More recent research has shed further light on these findings and provided a more nuanced understanding of the future benefits of self-control in childhood. Key Takeaways: The Marshmallow Test The marshmallow test was created by Walter Mischel. He and his colleagues used it to test young children’s ability to delay gratification.In the test, a child is presented with the opportunity to receive an immediate reward or to wait to receive a better reward.A relationship was found between children’s ability to delay gratification during the marshmallow test and their academic achievement as adolescents.More recent research has added nuance to these findings showing that environmental factors, such as the reliability of the environment, play a role in whether or not children delay gratification.Contrary to expectations, children’s ability to delay gratification during the marshmallow test has increased over time. The Original Marshmallow Test The original version of the marshmallow test used in studies by Mischel and colleagues consisted of a simple scenario. A child was brought into a room and presented with a reward, usually a marshmallow or some other desirable treat. The child was told that the researcher had to leave the room but if they could wait until the researcher returned, the child would get two marshmallows instead of just the one they were presented with. If they couldn’t wait, they wouldn’t get the more desirable reward. The researcher would then leave the room for a specific amount of time (typically 15 minutes but sometimes as long as 20 minutes) or until the child could no longer resist eating the single marshmallow in front of them. Over six years in the late 1960s and early 1970s, Mischel and colleagues repeated the marshmallow test with hundreds of children who attended the preschool on the Stanford University campus. The children were between 3 and 5 years old when they participated in the experiments. Variations on the marshmallow test used by the researchers included different ways to help the children delay gratification, such as obscuring the treat in front of the child or giving the child instructions to think about something else in order to get their mind off the treat they were waiting for. Years later, Mischel and colleagues followed up with some of their original marshmallow test participants. They discovered something surprising. Those individuals who were able to delay gratification during the marshmallow test as young children rated significantly higher on cognitive ability and the ability to cope with stress and frustration in adolescence. They also earned higher SAT scores. These results led many to conclude that the ability to pass the marshmallow test and delay gratification was the key to a successful future. However, Mischel and his colleagues were always more cautious about their findings. They suggested that the link between delayed gratification in the marshmallow test and future academic success might weaken if a larger number of participants were studied. They also observed that factors like the child’s home environment could be more influential on future achievement than their research could show. Recent Findings The relationship Mischel and colleagues found between delayed gratification in childhood and future academic achievement garnered a great deal of attention. As a result, the marshmallow test became one of the most well-known psychological experiments in history. Yet, recent studies have used the basic paradigm of the marshmallow test to determine how Mischel’s findings hold up in different circumstances. Delayed Gratification and Environmental Reliability In 2013, Celeste Kidd, Holly Palmeri, and Richard Aslin published a study that added a new wrinkle to the idea that delayed gratification was the result of a child’s level of self-control. In the study, each child was primed to believe the environment was either reliable or unreliable. In both conditions, before doing the marshmallow test, the child participant was given an art project to do. In the unreliable condition, the child was provided with a set of used crayons and told that if they waited, the researcher would get them a bigger, newer set. The researcher would leave and return empty-handed after two and a half minutes. The researcher would then repeat this sequence of events with a set of stickers. The children in the reliable condition experienced the same set up, but in this case the researcher came back with the promised art supplies. The children were then given the marshmallow test. Researchers found that those in the unreliable condition waited only about three minutes on average to eat the marshmallow, while those in the reliable condition managed to wait for an average of 12 minutes—substantially longer. The findings suggest that children’s ability to delay gratification isn’t solely the result of self-control. It’s also a rational response to what they know about the stability of their environment. Thus, the results show that nature and nurture play a role in the marshmallow test. A child’s capacity for self-control combined with their knowledge of their environment leads to their decision about whether or not to delay gratification. Marshmallow Test Replication Study In 2018, another group of researchers, Tyler Watts, Greg Duncan, and Haonan Quan, performed a conceptual replication of the marshmallow test. The study wasn’t a direct replication because it didn’t recreate Mischel and his colleagues exact methods. The researchers still evaluated the relationship between delayed gratification in childhood and future success, but their approach was different. Watts and his colleagues utilized longitudinal data from the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Study of Early Child Care and Youth Development, a diverse sample of over 900 children. In particular, the researchers focused their analysis on children whose mothers hadn’t completed college when they were born—a subsample of the data that better represented the racial and economic composition of children in America (although Hispanics were still underrepresented). Each additional minute a child delayed gratification predicted small gains in academic achievement in adolescence, but the increases were much smaller than those reported in Mischel’s studies. Plus, when factors like family background, early cognitive ability, and home environment were controlled for, the association virtually disappeared. The results of the replication study have led many outlets reporting the news to claim that Mischel’s conclusions had been debunked. However, things aren’t quite so black and white. The new study demonstrated what psychologists already knew: that factors like affluence and poverty will impact one’s ability to delay gratification. The researchers themselves were measured in their interpretation of the results. Lead  researcher Watts cautioned, â€Å"†¦these new findings should not be interpreted to suggest that gratification delay is completely unimportant, but rather that focusing only on teaching young children to delay gratification is unlikely to make much of a difference.† Instead, Watts suggested that interventions that focus on the broad cognitive and behavioral capabilities that help a child develop the ability to delay gratification would be more useful in the long term than interventions that only help a child learn to delay gratification. Cohort Effects in Delayed Gratification With mobile phones, streaming video, and on-demand everything today, its a common belief that childrens ability to delay gratification is deteriorating. In order to investigate this hypothesis, a group of researchers, including Mischel, conducted an analysis comparing American children who took the marshmallow test in the 1960s, 1980s, or 2000s. The children all came from similar socioeconomic backgrounds and were all 3 to 5 years old when they took the test. Contrary to popular expectations, children’s ability to delay gratification increased in each birth cohort. The children who took the test in the 2000s delayed gratification for an average of 2 minutes longer than the children who took the test in the 1960s and 1 minute longer than the children who took the test in the 1980s. The researchers suggested that the results can be explained by increases in IQ scores over the past several decades, which is linked to changes in technology, the increase in globalization, and changes in the economy. They also noted that the use of digital technology has been associated with an increased ability to think abstractly, which could lead to better executive function skills, such as the self-control associated with delayed gratification. Increased preschool attendance could also help account for the results. Nonetheless, the researchers cautioned that their study wasn’t conclusive. Future research with more diverse participants is needed to see if the findings hold up with different populations as well as what might be driving the results. Sources American Psychology Association. Can Kids Wait? Todays Youngsters May Be Able to Delay Gratification Longer Than Those of the 1960s. 25 June, 2018. https://www.apa.org/news/press/releases/2018/06/delay-gratificationAssociation for Psychological Science. A New Approach to the Marshmallow Test Yields Complicated Findings. 5 June, 2018. https://www.psychologicalscience.org/publications/observer/obsonline/a-new-approach-to-the-marshmallow-test-yields-complex-findings.htmlCarlson, Stephanie M., Yuichi Shoda, Ozlem Ayduk, Lawrence Aber, Catherine Schaefer, Anita Sethi, Nicole Wilson, Philip K. Peake, and Walter Mischel. Cohort Effects in Childrens Delay of Gratification. Developmental Psychology, vol. 54, no. 8, 2018, pp. 1395-1407. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/dev0000533Kidd, Celeste, Holly Palmeri, and Richard N. Aslin. Rational Snacking: Young Childrens Decision-Making on the Marshmallow Task is Moderated By Beliefs About Environmental Reliability. Cognition, vol. 126, no. 1, 2013, pp. 109 -114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2012.08.004New York University. Professor Replicates Famous Marshmallow Test, Makes New Observations. ScienceDaily, 25 May, 2018.  https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2018/05/180525095226.htmShoda, Yuichi, Walter Mischel, and Philip K. Peake. Predicting Adolescent Cognitive and Self-Regulatory Competencies from Preschool Delay of Gratification: Identifying Diagnostic Conditions. Developmental Psychology, vol. 26, no. 6, 1990, pp. 978-986. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.26.6.978University of Rochester. The Marshmallow Study Revisited. 11 October, 2012. https://www.rochester.edu/news/show.php?id4622Watts, Tyler W., Greg J. Duncan, and Haonan Quan. Revisiting the Marshmallow Test: A Conceptual Replication Investigating Links Between Early Delay of Gratification and Later Outcomes. Psychological Science, vol. 28, no. 7, 2018, pp. 1159-1177. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797618761661

Marketing Plan For A Business - 879 Words

A marketing plan completely relies on the marketing strategy which have been used in order to create a solid business plan for any corporate. In absence of strategies, it s an impossible to get large use of market plan. In terms of getting incentive benefits from a business, market plan gives a blueprint outlines of marketing efforts which have to be done to raise good business. A market plan is aimed to create incentive pay plans for business employees to satisfy the business corporate objectives behind the company mission to encourage and motivate the company staffs and also reward them for good sales. Furthermore, the corporate mission should not be either too narrow or too wide. A market plan is consist of deadlines, budget and staff allocation which identify, set and bring the marketing strategies to business life. A business has four steps to follow which are; 1) to build business plan 2) to implement strategies to business plan 3) to meet the business goal 4)to refine the corporate business draft. It a really important that the business strew goes which you have developed whether meeting the whole the business plan or not. So end of the process of business, they have been audited. Solid marketing tactics build a successful business so in this way, good strategies have to develop before we initiate the market plan. In the process of developing good market plan, a detailed market map have to be created. For making thoughtful, well organised and well informedShow MoreRelatedThe Marketing Plan For The Business Plan858 Words   |  4 Pagesimportant to protect it and continue the development and positioning it in the market. Therefore, there are numerous models of communication plans, the firm should use the one they find appropriate for them. In essence communications plans have several disciplines that interrelated and in synergy would support the business plan can create an effective communication plan with results potentially beneficial to the positioning of the brand. These disciplines are: advertising, paid search, social media, customerRead MoreMarketing Plan For A Business Plan1241 Words   |  5 Pages Marketing Plan As I navigated my way through the business plan provided to me by ChopSaver, I saw that they had a clear and concise marketing plan. Currently ChopSaver is sold online and in over 9,000 U.S. retailers, including over 7,000 CVS Pharmacy locations nationwide. When asked how they market their product, ChopSaver replied, â€Å"As a brand with a unique and authentic story behind it, we utilize both social media and public relations to tell the story. The musical part of the brand lends itselfRead MoreMarketing Plan For A Business Plan1266 Words   |  6 Pagesgrow health hair.† 2) Next, create an outline for a business plan by answering the following â€Å"nine questions every business plan should answer†: 1. Who is the customer? The customer is the party that will receives or consumes my products and has the ability to choose between different products and suppliers. The customers for my products would the working moms, housewives and dads in my local area. I would like to start by selling and marketing my product to them firms because I know how I can reachRead MoreMarketing Plan For A Business Plan1159 Words   |  5 PagesFirst Things First: Before you start tutoring, it s important to create a business plan, determine your company’s specialization and create a company image that sets you apart from the competition and attracts your target market. Draw up a Business Plan and Name Your Business: Name your tutorial business if you have not already done so. Brainstorm a list of names with the help of friends, family members and business partners. Choose a name that stands out and communicates your business’s uniqueRead MoreMarketing Plan For A Business Plan1445 Words   |  6 PagesMarketing plan is very important and pretty much to the overall financial and business plan. This plan is the way to success, and it is breaks down into two components that will enable The Sub Shop to perform marketing activities to provide a solid return on investment. Plan is designed to complete the business plan, but is also a way for company officers to get a handle on the external and internal factors that will influence the company s success in the Ashland market. The following topicsRead MoreMarketing Plan For A Business1200 Words   |  5 PagesGrowing your business can be a daunting task in today’s business and economic conditions. Competition is fierce in almost every trade. To carve out your own niche in a highly competitive market, you need to align your business plan with your marketing plan from the get-go. Customers today are influenced by several elements In addition to running your business, marketing your products or services has now become a full-fledged endeavor that is crucial to the promotion of a business. The promotionalRead MoreMarketing Plan For A Business Essay2071 Words   |  9 PagesThe success of any business lies in marketing, both internally and externally. The overall marketing aspect covers advertising, public relations, promotions and sales. Mokhtar Wan-Ismail (2012), citing Panayides definition states marketing is ‘†¦the process of planning and exacting the conception, pricing, promotion and distribution of ideas, goods and services to create exchanges and satisfy organizational objectives’. Without marketing, a business may offer the best products or service in an industryRead MoreMarketing Plan For A Business Plan1268 Words   |  6 Pagesare invested in making this a business not creating a hobby business for the sake of brewing beer. Therefore, a written business plan is in existence. A wr itten business plan would have been required to secure the government loan. ï‚ · A business plan should be a working document, not created and then placed in a drawer. It should remain on the desk as a reminder of the objectives and goals set forth initially and revised as the business grows and adapts. Every business owner has a goal of profitabilityRead MoreMarketing Plan For A Business Plan792 Words   |  4 PagesMarketing Plan A well-developed marketing plan will provide many benefits. For example, it will help Priority attract clients, keep marketing efforts aligned with the organizations mission and goals, and enable leaders to effectively evaluate the market environment in which they plan to operate. Since Priority is attempting to enter a new market, their marketing plan should emphasize strategies that will enable them to build their client base and gain market share. Additionally, Priority expectsRead MoreMarketing Plan For A Business Plan Competition1715 Words   |  7 PagesReview Research shows that business plan competitions throughout time have always provided a substantial opportunity to improve entrepreneurial education. Student entrepreneurs originally were interested in business plan competitions because it was a place for them to create and pitch their business ideas to real investors and get incredible feedback. However, over time, the location of the competitions, the people competing in the competitions, the robustness of business plans, and the outcome of the

The House On Mango Street, By Harper Lee - 2003 Words

Throughout every life, humans experience a rite of passage where they encounter transformative events that allow them to develop and grow towards adulthood. Harper Lee’s To Kill a Mockingbird and Sandra Cisneros’ The House on Mango Street both express this maturation and development from naivety. In To Kill a Mockingbird, Jem Finch lives in Maycomb, Alabama, a community gripped by racist attitudes during the Great Depression. In several childhood experiences, Jem grows after realizing the true character of his county’s members and gaining a greater sense of compassion towards other people. Esperanza of The House on Mango Street lives in an impoverished community where she is forced to realize the maturation of her sexuality at a hastened pace. Jem and Esperanza begin the journey to come of age through their loss of innocence from their respective encounters of racism and gender roles; however, Jem matures through his disillusionment and gaining of a greater sense sympathy in his experiences with illnesses and racism while Esperanza grows by gaining autonomy and independence because of her encounters with racism and sexual maturity. Jem and Esperanza lose their innocence through various experiences, which ultimately leads them towards adulthood. However, Jem’s specific development results from his realization of his community’s true colors and his gaining of a greater sense of empathy towards others. His acquirement and understanding of sympathy results from his encountersShow MoreRelatedThe House On Mango Street2609 Words   |  11 Pagesgrowing up more challenging. Scout in Harper Lee’s To Kill a Mockingbird and Esperanza in Sandra Cisneros’ The House on Mango Street experience the ideological maturity toward womanhood while encountering problems most do not face until adulthood. Living in conservative Alabama where racial tension is high, Scout must learn to be compassionate when her father Atticus Finch defen ds African-American Tom Robinson against a white woman. Growing up on Mango Street, an impoverished neighborhood of ChicagoRead MoreEssay on Analysis of The House on Mango Street by Sandra Cisneros4759 Words   |  20 Pagesâ€Å"The House on Mango Street† by Sandra Cisneros I will now concentrate on the background of the novel that moved Sandra Cisneros to write it by investigating the novel with special regard to its different dimensions. 1. The Novel 1.1 Summary The novel â€Å"The House on Mango Street† is written by Sandra Cineros. It deals with family, neighbourhood and dreams of a young Mexican girl, Esperanza Cordero growing up in Chicago. The novel begins when the Corderos move into a new house on Mango StreetRead MoreLiterary Criticism : The Free Encyclopedia 7351 Words   |  30 Pagesa Mockingbird, by Harper Lee (1960)[30] Dune, by Frank Herbert (1965)[33] The Outsiders, by S. E. Hinton (1967)[34] A Wizard of Earthsea, by Ursula K. Le Guin (1968)[35] I Know Why the Caged Bird Sings, by Maya Angelou (1969) Bless Me, Ultima, by Rudolfo Anaya (1972) The World According to Garp, by John Irving (1978) The Discovery of Slowness, by Sten Nadolny (1983) Bright Lights, Big City, by Jay McInerney (1984)[36] Ender s Game, by Orson Scott Card (1985)[34] The Cider House Rules, by John Irving

Ryan DeMattia Essay Example For Students

Ryan DeMattia Essay AH:31/9/2004Rose: I bet on baseballWho: Pete Rose, former manager of the Cincinnati RedsWhen: Thursday, January 8, 2004What: Pete Rose, accused of betting on baseball, publiclyannounced the truth in his book My Prison Without Bars, whichwas released on ThursdayWhere: In his new autobiography, My Prison Without BarsWhy: Rose, figuring if he came clean they would take away his ban onbaseball so he would have a chance at the Hall of FameHow: Pete Rose had been gambling in baseball for 14 years. After beingcaught, baseball attorney John Dowd estimated that Rose had bet 412 times,52 of them on Cincinnati wins. In his book, Rose finally admitted he hadplaced bets with Ronald Peters. When quoted, he said If I had been aalcoholic or drug addict, baseball would have suspended me for six weeksand paid for my rehab. I should have gotten help, but baseball had no fancyrehab for gamblers like they do for drug addicts. Also, he stated thatgambling had no affect on his managing, nor had he betted against the Reds.The way I saw it, I didnt really have a problem. Unfortunately, thisdecision isnt up to him, and the commissioner of baseball is still tryingto decide if he should be in or out.

Pros and Cons of Exporting to a Regionally Integrated Market free essay sample

Since the main Justification behind regional trade agreement is in the best interest of the regional members and at the expense of diverting trades from third party countries. In another word, very few advantages can be found from an exporters point of view, not to mention a great deal of stumbling blocks in terms of government protectionism for the better soundness of EUS internal trade. Countries like EIJ are very regionally economically integrated in that there are strong economic union as well as political integration, especially in terms of trade. As a esult, EIJ will very much benefit from its regionalism from the reduction of tariff and non-tariff barriers that are only enjoyed by member states. Certainly its more profitable to expand our market, especially in big country like France, however the drawbacks outweigh extensively in that our competitive advantages will be easily offset by the internal reduction of barriers in EIJ honey manufacturing industry, consequently leaving us very little profit margin. We will write a custom essay sample on Pros and Cons of Exporting to a Regionally Integrated Market or any similar topic specifically for you Do Not WasteYour Time HIRE WRITER Only 13.90 / page Besides the fact the sales might shoot up in the short term, there are almost no pros but cons in exporting to ELI, including a lengthy due- processes, no advantages ompare to EIJ members and great degree of country and economic risks. France is the second biggest member in EIJ in terms of honey consumptions. It will certainly account for a major proportion of our production outsource. This will largely increase our sales revenue as well as the economy of scale to expand the company. Moreover, when penetrating regional integrated market like France, its likely our company will be subsidized by government which is critical in logistic and country risk cost cutting. However, prior to entering, EIJ firstly has laid down extensive and lengthy legislation pplying to the EIJ import of honey intended for human consumption Before an EIJ buyer places an order, he needs to be sure your honey complies with the EIJ requirements and his own quality demands. U buyers will theretore require documentation on chemical analyses of each batch of honey. Most EIJ honey importers make use of the internationally acknowledged chemical laboratory on honey, Applica, to perform analyses (CBI, March, 2008) Along with the import license acquisition, it requires extremely long due-process and in turn increasing our inventory storage cost. Secondly, with regional free trade, roduction shifts toward the most efficient manufacturers of honey within the RTA. The fact that they retaining barriers to trade with nonmembers deprives our cost leadership and consumers will never consider our honey when there are cheaper options elsewhere. Lastly, highly integrated RTA in EIJ also reflects a strong economic union that readily affects France, which makes Frances economic and cultural prospects very volatile to predict and understand since the internal members are very inter-related particularly when theres an economic recession, for instance the ecent contagion of Greek debt crisis towards EIJ.